BLAMEDIA

PRESS RELEASE 2016:
KIRCHE UND STAAT DECKEN PERVERTIERTE ANGESTELLTE UND IHRE ZUHÄLTER
Es ist im Interesse der ganzen Bevölkerung aber besonders für die gläubige Gemeinschaft, dass diese Fälle publik werden. Es hat sich wiederholt gezeigt, dass Angehörige der Kirche (Kloster Einsiedeln aber auch andere z.B. Herz Jesu Oerlikon), der Polizei, Justiz und Armee schwere Formen sexueller Nötigung und Ausbeutung fördern, decken und unterstützen. Zu junge Menschen werden von dieser Gruppierung zu sexuellem Missbrauch gezwungen. Dies wird in besetzten Häusern gemacht aber es werden offenbar auch unter Hypnose und mit illegalen Waffen willkürlich Opfer von Parties verschleppt und missbraucht. Der erste Fall wurde bereits 2013 der Stadtpolizei Zürich und KSMM gemeldet und hatte danach für die ganze Stadt Zürich schwere Attacken zur Folge. Ganze Stadtteile wurden besetzt und von getarnten Armeen kontrolliert. Auch Zeugen dieses Falls, besonders alleinstehende Frauen, wurden die letzten Jahre von Polizei und Armee mit hoch illegalen Methoden konstant belästigt und verleumdet. Die Korruptionen und Befehle für diese Verbrechen wurden eindeutig durch Staat und Kirche veranlasst. Martin Werlen hat sich diesbezüglich zusammen mit Richer Erb an einer Gerichtsverhandlung damals unzulässiger Absprachen schuldig gemacht. Man liess mir ausrichten, dass ich nicht mehr zu diesem besetzten Haus gehen solle, wo man junge Menschen unter widrigsten Umständen ausgebeutet und missbraucht hat. Alle anwesenden Personen dieser Verhandlung sind Zeuge davon gewesen. Woher sich die beiden kennen und wieso das Kloster über diesen Fall informiert war, ist schleierhaft und sollte uns alle brennend interessieren. Die Unterdrückung der Bevölkerung und der Personen, die solche Verbrechen bekämpfen, wurde bis heute durch die Tätergruppen fortgesetzt obwohl diverse Behörden und Gerichte (BKP und Militärjustiz) informiert waren. Besonders nachdem letztes Jahr der 2. Fall mit den gleichen Tätern in Wetzikon ans Licht kam. Eindeutig von der gleichen Gruppe höchst pervertierter Personen organisiert. Trotz all der Aufregung, die seither im Hintergrund deswegen in unserem Land stattgefunden hat, wurde nichts gegen diese hoch illegalen Formen von sexuellem/rituellem Missbrauch unternommen und man muss sich fragen, welchem Zweck diese Aktionen dienten, wenn sie nicht nur darauf abzielten die Bevölkerung von diesen Tatsachen abzulenken. Die katholische Kirche ist ebenfalls nachweislich und schon seit langer Zeit immer wieder in diverse Missbrauchsfälle verstrickt und dies weiterhin zu leugnen und vertuschen, wirft auf alle Beteiligten ein sehr schlechtes Licht. Anhand der Berichte geht eindeutig hervor um was für ekelhaft perverse Formen von Missbrauch es sich handelt und das diese offensichtlich von diversen Staatsangestellten und anderen entarteten Kreaturen unserer Gesellschaft ausgelebt und gedeckt werden. Als wäre es der normale Preis, den wir hier alle für unseren Luxus zu zahlen haben. Ich denke nicht, dass das Volk bereit ist diesen Blutzoll zu zahlen und auf unschuldigen Menschen auszutragen. Gerade von der Kirche würde man das nicht erwarten, was uns eigentlich zeigen sollte um was für einen Gott es sich handelt, der in diesen Freimaurertempeln verherrlicht wird. Der Missbrauch fängt also bereits bei den naiven Gläubigen an, die dazu benutzt werden den Dreck hinter dieser scheinheiligen Fassade zu unterstützen. Es muss davon ausgegangen werden, dass auch im Kloster Einsiedeln und auf der Insel Ufenau geheime satanische Rituale abgehalten werden, was Opferungen nicht ausschliesst. Ich bin mir sicher, dass man bei genaueren Inspektionen Beweise dafür finden würde. Diese Mönche dort praktizieren offensichtlich eine der dunkelsten Formen der schwarzen Magie bzw. Okkultismus, was durch ihre schwarzen Kutten und die presente Verbindung zu den Raben ziemlich deutlich hervor geht. Der schwarze Kubus, in der die schwarze Maria steht, sollte uns fragen, welcher Glaube dort praktiziert wird bzw. wer/was dort angebetet wird. Martin Werlen wurde im Vatikan ausgebildet. Dieses Thema ist breit dokumentiert und kann helfen diesen Fall besser zu verstehen. Okkultismus/Satanismus ist in unserer Gesellschaft offenbar weit verbreitet. Viel mehr als der normale Mensch glauben kann weil das auch alles heimlich und unterirdisch ausgeführt wird. Und doch scheint alles darauf aufgebaut zu sein und dann versteht man auch, warum die Welt am Abgrund steht. Mit diesem Fundament werden wir alle keine lebenswerte Zukunft haben. Dieser Gott verachtet alles Leben und das muss man den Menschen zeigen, bevor sie blind mit ihren Teufelshirten ins Schlachthaus zur Hölle fahren. Selbst gegen Papst Franziskus wurde bereits ein Haftbefehl wegen Beteiligung an einem pädophilen Netzwerk, das auch Kindstötungen einschliesst, ausgestellt. Diesen mutigen Schritt sollten wir als Vorbild nehmen um gemeinsam gegen diese verlogene und pervertierte Staatskirchentyrannei vorzugehen. Der aktuelle Kinofilm Spotlight hat dieses Thema auch sehr gut beleuchtet und basiert ebenfalls auf einer wahren Begebenheit. Das sollte uns allen Mut machen um uns diesen Fakten zu stellen und mit allen Mitteln gegen diese Schande vorzugehen. Da die Regierung nicht dazu bereit ist diese Formen organisierten Verbrechens und systematischer Ausbeutung zu unterbinden und auch Angehörige der Kirche dafür zur Rechenschaft zu ziehen, ist es umso wichtiger, dass die Bevölkerung darüber informiert wird und selbst dafür sorgen kann, dass in solchen Fällen Konsequenzen gezogen werden. Falls Sie Ihre Aufgabe als Aufklärer des Volks wahrnehmen und nicht nur dem Diktat missinformierender Brainwashmedien folgen wollen, sollten Sie dieser Sache nachgehen. Ansonsten werden wir in Zukunft wieder unsere eigenen Medien veröffentlichen müssen um den Bürgern die Wahrheit mitzuteilen, wenn sich das hier sonst keiner mehr traut.  
Vielen Dank für Ihre Mitarbeit zur Rettung der menschlichen Würde.

REVENGE

All men and women who abused my friends and family or other innocents especially children will be punished. Possibly with castration. And anyone who knows where those entrances to the sub-terrain of Switzerland are and still protect or support those insane and perverted creatures will be hanged once everyone knows whats going on here under their very noses. And they will. And they will take over by violent force. Myself included.

FLOODING THE UNDERGROUND!

STALKERITIS

Its six o clock in the morning and ive just spotted the first psyco stalker when checking out the neighbourhood..sitting in their cars with their i-phones in the hand not knowing what to do next..all of them will from now on be real-time reported in here. Their license plates, faces etc. Ive already know where those criminals live (Vogelsberg/Waldhof) and that they are all connected to some foreign mafia..the serbic people have been involved from the beginning..and obviously there are a lot more corrupt and sick people out there especially from other countries like southamerica and the emirates. Seems they do anything for a little bit of money. Sad people who are more than willing to sacrifice their lives and souls to destroy innocent and much more intelligent beings than they are or ever will be. Guess its time to make contacts with the russians and the U.S. they can clean up their own mess and we all know how they will do that. Those creatures need to be removed from authority. Now.

ATTACK!!!!

OBSERVATORIUM HELVETICACA

RISE UP FOLKS!!!

ANOTHER UNTRUTH FROM THE SWISS ILLITARIANS: http://www.20min.ch/schweiz/news/story/11332358
Our case reported in December 2015 seems not to exist...and sure many more...LIES OVER LIES!

Last letter to the miltary justice dept Goerrlichs who obviously are in contact with the local harassers as they kept more distance afterwards but they are still here and spy on us 24/7 and truly think in their completly brainwashed zombie brains that this is totally justified and normal. Their judgement day will come. Sooner than later. And hatered and death is all they will reap:
Guten Tag. Wir werden hier immer noch von diesen hoch kriminellen Tätergruppen extrem belagert und auch mit eindeutig professionellen Frequenzwaffen regelmässig und massiv bestrahlt bzw. gefoltert. Es sind hier auch kleine Kinder im Haus und wir sind alle keine Terroristen. Falls das nicht augenblicklich aufhört, werden hier ausführliche Frequenzmessungen gemacht und Sie und dieser ganze Terroristenverein der Armee auf Schadensersatz verklagt. Diese Folter zielt darauf ab Menschen so zu schwächen damit sie krank werden und sterben. Ich ertrage das nun schon seit über 3 Jahren nur weil ich einen haarsträubenden Menschenhandelsfall und die damit verbundenen Verbrechen gemeldet habe. Wenn man in der Schweiz neuerdings legal mit Menschen handeln und diese zu Tode foltern darf, geben Sie mir doch bitte Bescheid, dann machen wir das in Zukunft auch. Zeitig zur Lynchjustiz, die bei Komplettversagen jeglicher Gerechtigkeit wohl zum Tragen kommen und durch das Volk vollstreckt wird. Mit mir hat das wenig zu tun und ich lasse mir für die Fehler der Regierung auch nicht mein Leben zerstören. Entweder sie sind für das Volk oder dagegen und wie man hier mit normalen Bürgern umgeht, ist wirklich unter aller Sau und ich werde dies auch nicht mehr länger hinnehmen. Jegliche Kooperation und Kommunikation ist hiermit für alle Zeiten beendet und Sie werden in diesem Zusammenhang dann von anderen Stellen wieder hören. Diese gezielte und missbräuchliche Staatsfolter, Staatsüberwachung und Staatsvergiftung ist untragbar geworden und ein Verbrechen an der ganzen Bevölkerung.

http://www.spyemporium.com/counter-surveillance-measure-detector.html
http://rfexplorer.com/models/

http://www.aaronia.com/products/spectrum-analyzers/

ANTI-SURVEILLANCE:
That this iconographic robot-person has a cannonball bomb with a lit fuse for a head represents the explosive volatility of the situation: viewing people as threats to be monitored and controlled, rather than as citizens with civil rights, may destroy civil society and/or may lead to violent opposition.

The section on methods of attack is the most provocative. The methods described are placing around cameras plastic bags filled with glue, affixing stickers or tape over camera lenses, shooting cameras with children’s highpowered water gun toys filled with paint, temporarily disabling lenses with laser pointers, cutting CCTV cables with axes or garden tools, and dropping concrete blocks on cameras from rooftops. Rather than simply describing methods for disabling video surveillance cameras, however, the instructions reveal a pattern of values and an engaging subtext about camera destruction as an embodied social practice. Thus, methods that draw public attention to the surveillance systems or that reveal cameras as inoperable (such as shooting them with paint guns) are preferred to those that do not heighten public awareness (such as disabling cameras with a laser pointer). Along these lines, regarding the method of bagging cameras, the site says: ‘‘To Bag a camera theres a high chance that you can reach it with ease. If this is the case dont hesitate to smash the glass, lens and any other components. Dont bag it afterwards, people need to see the units smashed’’ (spelling errors and abbreviations are accurate to the website and serve to reinforce the low-tech aesthetic).

‘‘iSEE v.911: ‘Now more than ever.’’’
Once past the opening scene, the application presents the user with a street map of Manhattan with a dramatic black background and abundant red boxes indicating areas under video surveillance. The map is engaged by clicking first on a starting point and second on a destination point. After a few seconds of calculation, a yellow route is indicated for a person to travel the path of least surveillance to his or her destination.

The guide to camera destruction, on the other hand, encourages resistance against public surveillance through low-tech, neo-Luddite attacks. Both forms of counter-surveillance, however, focus their attention and critique on the technologies of surveillance, which act as material representations of large-scale monitoring regimes. Neither of them directly targets the public and private institutions that are mobilizing surveillance or the individuals within these institutions.

The IAA’s information page for iSee mobilizes social science research on surveillance, complete with academic citations, to thoroughly document trends toward increased abuse of marginalized groups with video surveillance, most notably of minorities, women, youth, outsiders (such as the homeless), and activists. Part of the reason that the technologies lend themselves to these uses, the site explains, is that policies for surveillance oversight, access, or retention are either purposely opaque or nonexistent; this is especially true in the United States because so much public surveillance in that country is conducted by private companies, so the equipment and footage is privately owned. Of course, it should be pointed out that, regardless of regulation or oversight, the technologies themselves insulate the operators from immediate, if not all, scrutiny, thereby encouraging widespread voyeurism of women (Norris and Armstrong 1997; Koskela 2000; Rosen 2001) and profiling of racial and other minorities (Lyon 2001).

It is doubtful that police or security forces are intentionally manipulating spaces and bodies with surveillance and other strategies because they explicitly wish to neutralize democratic opportunities; in fact, they most likely believe that their actions of social control are preserving democracy by safeguarding the status quo (Monahan 2006b).

[In control societies], individuals become ‘dividuals,’ and masses become samples, data, markets, or ‘banks’ … Disciplinary man produced energy in discrete amounts, while control man undulates, moving among a continuous range of different orbits
(Deleuze 1995)

To bring to light what is ‘the hidden’ par excellence, what escapes the gaze of science because it is hidden in the very gaze of the scientist, the transcendental unconscious, one has to historicize the subject of historicization, to objectivate the subject of the objectivation … To be able to apply to their own practice the objectivation techniques that they apply to the other sciences, sociologists have to convert reflexivity into a disposition constitutive of their scientific habitus, a reflexivity reflex.

However, static surveillance — when carried out properly — is difficult to detect because good surveillance operatives blend in with their surroundings and make themselves as innocuous as possible. As creatures of habit, most people get used to their surroundings, and fail to notice things they see every day. By blending in with the scenery the subject sees every day, such as the local neighborhood or route taken every morning to work, the operative can effectively become invisible. Because of this, static surveillance requires a high degree of situational awareness — and a certain amount of paranoia — to detect.

Although static surveillance is the hardest type to detect and counter, it is expensive — as it can involve renting apartments, stores, street vendor kiosks and carts and other similar observation posts, known as “perches” in surveillance jargon. Because the operatives do not move, static surveillance requires that operatives be perched at close intervals so that they can keep a constant eye on the target. In general, only governments have the manpower and resources necessary to do this type of surveillance properly.

Mobile surveillance can be carried out in two ways: in vehicles or on foot. A wider area can be covered in vehicular surveillance — and is vital if the subject is traveling by car — although this type of surveillance does have limitations. Should the subject go into an office building, a subway or a shopping mall, for example, the operatives in the vehicle cannot follow. Because of this limitation, vehicular surveillance is usually carried out in conjunction with foot surveillance. The operatives on foot are in communication with the operatives in the vehicle. In addition, the operatives in the vehicle will often drop off one of their team to continue following the target. Mixed car/foot operations are effective because the target more often will focus on other pedestrians rather than the cars around him.

Environmental activists, animal rights activists, anarchists and anti-globalization activists frequently surveil their subjects before staging a protest or “direct action” operations. Groups that target corporations for sabotage, such as the Earth Liberation Front, are especially sophisticated in the use of technical surveillance.
The Ruckus Society is a group devoted to training activists in “electronic scouting” — technical surveillance involving the use of remote cameras, GPS locators, frequency counters, programmable scanners and night-vision goggles. Program graduates, then, utilize high-tech equipment such as miniature remote cameras and “bionic ear” listening devices to conduct their surveillance. These activists frequently use programmable scanners and cameras to monitor security/ police communications and activity in order to warn the saboteurs of an impeding response by law enforcement.

The bubble also provides protection against any erratic move the target might utilize to determine if he is being watched, or to ditch the surveillance. Therefore, if the team senses that the target has begun to “stairstep” (a series of deliberate turns intended to expose a surveillance team) through a residential neighborhood with very little activity on the street, the team using the bubble can wait outside the area instead of following the target through the maneuvers. Teams using a bubble will also frequently change “the eye” (the person directly watching the target) so that the target does not see the same face or vehicle twice.

Again, in almost all cases, only a government has the resources and training to effectively provide this highest level of surveillance coverage.

In order to conduct surveillance uninterrupted over a long period of time, a combination of static and vehicular surveillance is often employed. Static surveillance operatives will stake out the subject’s location — perhaps renting an apartment across the street from the person’s home, and then give a “call out” to the mobile surveillance team when the subject moves. The static operative will advise the mobile team what direction the subject is going and if the subject is on foot or in a vehicle.

Physical surveillance — especially on a surveillance-aware target — is extremely difficult to carry out effectively, as it requires a great deal of training and practical experience. Criminals and terrorists who attempt to pull off an effective tail often lack the street skills to be effective, and often make mistakes that tip off the target. Because their objective can be to ambush — to kill or kidnap the subject — spotting physical surveillance is of critical importance.

Role playing is an important aspect of undercover surveillance work — and those who attempt it without sufficient training often make mistakes that can alert their subject to the fact that they are being watched, or raise the suspicions of law enforcement or countersurveillance teams.

The purpose of using good cover for action and cover for status is to make the operative’s presence look routine and normal. When done right, the operative fits in with the mental snapshot subconsciously taken by the subject as he goes about his business. Inexperienced surveillance operative, or those without adequate resources, can be easily detected and their cover blown.

An acronym used by government agencies when training operatives in effective surveillance is TEDD: Time, Environment, Distance and Demeanor. Failure to take into account these four elements is another amateurish mistake that can get the operative caught. The factors of time, environment and distance are important because a subject who notices the same person hovering around again and again at different times and locations is more likely to become aware that he is being watched. Demeanor refers to lack of cover or simply bad body language — which also can alert a subject to the presence of a surveillance team.

Victims of planned hostile actions — such as kidnappings or killings — almost always are closely monitored by their attackers in advance of the operation. Such pre-operational surveillance enables the plotters to determine the best method of attack, as well as the best time and place to carry it out. Savvy countersurveillance, however, can go a long way toward thwarting a hostile act.

The cardinal rule for personal safety is for people to be aware of their surroundings at all times and to observe the behavior of others in the area. However, detecting surveillance — especially when it is performed well — often requires that one take extra precautions. One of the best ways for a person to determine whether he or she is being tailed is to use a surveillance detection route (SDR). By altering their behavior, those under surveillance can manipulate the situation, causing members of the surveillance team to act in ways that betray their presence and intentions. In fact, understanding that a potential victim can manipulate a surveillance situation is one of the most important lessons to be gleaned from this series.

Physical threats to individuals from terrorists, assassins, kidnappers or even stalkers are site-dependant. The assailants choose the location and timing of their attack based on criteria that gives them the best chance of successfully carrying out the attack and — unless the attacker is mentally disturbed or on a suicide mission — of escaping. These criteria include restricting or controlling the target’s ability to maneuver or escape, and providing optimal cover for any surveillance or attack team.

Security is vital to the success & survival of the resistance movement. This is because we have an enemy who actively works to undermine, neutralize, & ultimately destroy us. Failure to remain aware of security concerns can mean the difference between victory or defeat, freedom or imprisonment, life or death. Not only for yourself, but others around you. Information gathered from various sources, & that is subjected to analysis & comparison, is called intelligence. The gathering of intelligence is a vital part of counter-insurgency operations, without which the enemy does not know who, what, where or when to strike.

Security & Counter-Surveillance measures are designed to limit & deny the flow of information to enemy forces. It is based on the principle that counter-insurgency is a permanent part of society and that those engaged in resistance are always vulnerable to surveillance & repression.

Surveillance is the continuous, secretive observation of persons, places, things or objects, in order to gain information. There are two types of surveillance: physical & technical. Physical surveillance is carried out by enemy personnel on foot and/or by vehicle. It is the only way a target person can be continuously observed over an extended period of time. Surveillance teams can be comprised of two persons in one vehicle, or a dozen operators in six vehicles (or even more, of course). In addition, motorcycles, bikes, planes & helicopters may also be used.

In this category we must also consider informants, infiltrators & collaborators. They may be police agents, civilians recruited by police, or former comrades. This form of physical surveillance is the main source of intelligence on people’s thoughts, plans & activities. It is sometimes referred to as ‘human intelligence’. Because of the sensitive nature of personal information they are able to gather, and their ability to influence events, infiltrators & informants are especially dangerous.

Technical surveillance is far more common. With widespread use of telecommunications (phone, cell, pager, internet, fax), technical surveillance is a main source of intelligence on a person’s day to day activities, contacts, personal relationships, etc. More generally, it consists of technical devices to record, document or monitor a target individual’s movements, conversations, or activities. This
includes listening devices in homes & cars, tapped telephones, monitoring of internet activity, CCTV video, tracking devices, night-vision devices, etc.

In rural areas, physical surveillance is more often necessary due to the lack of telecommunications, roads, etc. Low population densities also serve to identify surveillance operators as ‘outsiders’. For these reasons, physical surveillance in rural areas often requires long-range observation (by ground teams, aircraft, or satellite in high priority situations). In some cases, police in military-style camouflage secretly conduct surveillance at a much closer range.

Teams may set up OPs on overlooking hills or mountainsides, using hi-powered long-range cameras & telescopes, or in nearby forest, abandoned buildings, fields, bushes, etc. Operators may wear camouflage clothing, including 'ghillie suits', and construct camouflaged hide positions (digging out an area large enough to lie in, setting up overhead support, and covering it with the top layer of earth).

Confirming surveillance can often be difficult. It is usually done to determine if surveillance exists (in order to evade it). For this reason, obvious surveillance detection should be avoided. If operators think a target is engaging in counter-surveillance, they may become more sophisticated in their approach, and may believe the target is going to carry out some ‘illegal’ activity.

In most cases, surveillance operators will withdraw if they believe they have been detected. Surveillance itself may be stopped. In other situations, surveillance teams may maintain command of the target even if detected (overt surveillance). Obvious surveillance by police is sometimes used to intimidate targets as part of a larger psychological warfare operation, usually designed to neutralize the target through fear and paranoia.

Informants and infiltrators are spies who gather information on the resistance & provide it to the enemy. They may also take a more active role. These acts can result in capture, arrests, imprisonment, and death. The term collaborator is used for any member or citizen who aids or assists our enemy.

Informants & infiltrators provide unique & special human intelligence (i.e., emotional states, plans, intentions, etc.) which can be gained in no other way. In addition, infiltrators & collaborators can physically disrupt & sabotage movement activities. They can spread disinformation & poisonous gossip, creating division and paranoia. They can also record incriminating statements and actions. Overall, they are an essential & active element in counter-insurgency operations as well as criminal investigations.

Informants are persons recruited by the state security forces to provide information. They are civilians, usually friends or associates of the target group. They could be embittered comrades who feel isolated or even betrayed by the group. Or, they could be genuine members arrested and subject
to pressure. Police refer to them as 'Confidential Informants' or 'Confidential Sources'.

HOSTILE SURVEILLANCE&TORTURE

We are each night under attack by some illitalian nazis..they torture me with high frequencies that can be felt..my heart is racing very irregular lately which indicates that they over do it..we have small children in the house which are definately affected by these attacks and they dont care..they want us all to die and thats what they try to hide with this terror..which is only here to kill..so that all the crimes they commit against innocent people can keep going on undisturbed by the public eye..you are less than worms..

STOP THE NAZI FILTH!

Stratford.com:
Almost any criminal act, from a purse-snatching to a terrorist bombing, involves some degree of pre-operational surveillance. In fact, one common denominator of all the different potential threats — whether from lone wolves, militant groups, common criminals or the mentally disturbed — is that those planning an operation all monitor their target in advance. However, while pickpockets or purse-snatchers case their victims for perhaps only a few seconds or minutes, a militant organization might conduct detailed surveillance of a target for several weeks or even months.

Regardless of the length of time surveillance is performed, however, the criminal or militant conducting it is exposed, and therefore vulnerable to detection. Because of this, countersurveillance (CS) — the process of detecting and mitigating hostile surveillance — is an important, though often overlooked, element of counterterrorism and security operations. CS is especially important because it is one of the few security measures that allows for threats to be dealt with before they can develop into active attacks.

An effective CS program depends on knowing two "secrets": first, hostile surveillance is vulnerable to detection because those performing it are not always as sophisticated in their tradecraft as commonly perceived; and second, hostile surveillance can be manipulated and the operatives forced into making errors that will reveal their presence.

The First Secret

Various potential assailants use different attack cycles, which vary depending on the nature and objectives of the plotter. For example, the typical six-step terrorist attack cycle does not always apply to a suicide bomber (who is not concerned about escape) or a mentally disturbed stalker (who is not concerned about escape or media exploitation). It is during the early phases of the attack cycle — the target selection and the planning phases — that the plotters conduct their surveillance, though they even can use a surveillance team during the actual attack to signal that the target is approaching the attack zone.

The purpose of pre-operational surveillance is to determine the target's vulnerabilities. Surveillance helps to quantify the target, note possible weaknesses and even to begin to identify potential attack methods. When the target is a person, perhaps targeted for assassination or kidnapping, surveillants will look for patterns of behavior such as the time the target leaves for work, the transportation method and the route taken. They also will take note of the type of security, if any, the target uses. For fixed targets such as buildings, the surveillance will be used to determine physical security measures as well as patterns of behavior within the guard force, if guards are employed. For example, the plotters will look for fences, gates, locks and alarms, but also will look for times when fewer guards are present or when the guards are about to come on or off their shifts. All of this information will then be used to select the best time and location for the attack, the type of attack and the resources needed to execute it.

Since an important objective of pre-operational surveillance is establishing patterns, the operatives will conduct their surveillance several times, often at different times of the day. Additionally, they will follow a mobile target to different environments and in diverse locations. This is when it is important to know the first "secret" of CS: surveillants are vulnerable to detection. In fact, the more surveillance they conduct, the greater the chances are of them being observed. Once that happens, security personnel can be alerted and the entire plan compromised. Additionally, surveillants who themselves are being watched can unwittingly lead intelligence and law enforcement agencies to other members of their organization.

Surveillance

A large and professional surveillance team can use a variety of fixed and mobile assets, including electronic listening devices and operatives on foot, in vehicles and even in aircraft. Such a large team can be extremely difficult for anyone to spot. A massive surveillance operation, however, requires an organization with vast assets and a large number of well-trained operatives. This level of surveillance, therefore, is usually only found at the governmental level, as most militant organizations lack the assets and the number of trained personnel required to mount such an operation. Indeed, most criminal and militant surveillance is conducted by one person, or by a small group of operatives. This means they must place themselves in a position to see the target — and thus be seen — with far more frequency than would be required in a huge surveillance operation. And the more they show their faces, the more vulnerable they are to detection. This vulnerability is amplified if the operatives are not highly trained.

The al Qaeda manual "Military Studies in the Jihad against the Tyrants" and its online training magazines not only instruct operatives planning an attack to conduct surveillance, they also point out the type of information that should be gathered. These documents, however, do not teach jihadist operatives how to go about gathering the required information. In the United States, the Ruckus Society's Scouting Manual provides detailed instructions for conducting surveillance, or "scouting," as the society calls it, on "direct action" targets. Following written instructions, however, does not automatically translate into having skilled surveillance operatives on the street. This is because, while some basic skills and concepts can be learned by reading, applying that information to a real-world situation, particularly in a hostile environment, can be exceedingly difficult. This is especially true when the application requires subtle and complex skills that are difficult to master.

The behaviors necessary to master surveillance tradecraft are not intuitive, and in fact frequently run counter to human nature. Because of this, intelligence and security professionals who work surveillance operations receive in-depth training that includes many hours of heavily critiqued practical exercises, often followed by field training with experienced surveillance operatives.

Most militant groups do not provide this level of training, and as a result, poor tradecraft has long proven to be an Achilles' heel for militants, who typically use a small number of poorly trained operatives to conduct their surveillance operations.

What does "bad" surveillance look like? The U.S. government uses the acronym TEDD to illustrate the principles one can use to identify surveillance. So, a person who sees someone repeatedly over Time, in different Environments and over Distance, or one who displays poor Demeanor can assume he or she is under surveillance. Surveillants who exhibit poor demeanor, meaning they act unnaturally, can look blatantly suspicious, though they also can be lurkers — those who have no reason for being where they are or for doing what they are doing. Sometimes they exhibit almost imperceptible behaviors that the target senses more than observes. Other giveaways include moving when the target moves, communicating when the target moves, avoiding eye contact with the target, making sudden turns or stops, or even using hand signals to communicate with other members of a surveillance team.

The mistakes made while conducting surveillance can be quite easy to catch — as long as someone is looking for them. If no one is looking, however, hostile surveillance is remarkably easy. This is why militant groups have been able to get away with conducting surveillance for so long using bumbling operatives who practice poor tradecraft.

The Second Secret

At the most basic level, CS can be performed by a person who is aware of his or her surroundings and who is watching for people who violate the principles of TEDD. At a more advanced level, the single person can use surveillance detection routes (SDRs) to draw out surveillance. This leads to the second "secret": due to the nature of surveillance, those conducting it can be manipulated and forced to tip their hand.

It is far more difficult to surveil a mobile target than a stationary one, and an SDR is a tool that takes advantage of this difficulty and uses a carefully designed route to flush out surveillance. The SDR is intended to look innocuous from the outside, but is cleverly calculated to evoke certain behaviors from the surveillant.

When members of a highly trained surveillance team recognize that the person they are following is executing an SDR — and therefore is trying to manipulate them — they will frequently take countermeasures suitable to the situation and their mission. This can include dropping off the target and picking up surveillance another day, bypassing the channel, stair-step or other trap the target is using and picking him or her up at another location along their projected route. It can even include "bumper locking" the target or switching to a very overt mode of surveillance to let the target know that his SDR was detected — and not appreciated. Untrained surveillants who have never encountered an SDR, however, frequently can be sucked blindly into such traps.

Though intelligence officers performing an SDR need to look normal from the outside — in effect appear as if they are not running an SDR — people who are acting protectively on their own behalf have no need to be concerned about being perceived as being "provocative" in their surveillance detection efforts. They can use very aggressive elements of the SDR to rapidly determine whether the surveillance they suspect does in fact exist — and if it does, move rapidly to a pre-selected safe-haven.

At a more advanced level is the dedicated CS team, which can be deployed to determine whether a person or facility is under surveillance. This team can use mobile assets, fixed assets or a combination of both. The CS team is essentially tasked to watch for watchers. To do this, team members identify places — "perches" in surveillance jargon — that an operative would need to occupy in order to surveil a potential target. They then watch those perches for signs of hostile surveillance.

CS teams can manipulate surveillance by "heating up" particular perches with static guards or roving patrols, thus forcing the surveillants away from those areas and toward another perch or perches where the CS team can then focus its detection efforts. They also can use overt, uniformed police or guards to stop, question and identify any suspicious person they observe. This can be a particularly effective tactic, as it can cause militants to conclude that the facility they are monitoring is too difficult to attack. Even if the security forces never realized the person was actually conducting surveillance, such an encounter normally will lead the surveillant to assume that he or she has been identified and that the people who stopped him knew exactly what he was doing.

Confrontational techniques can stop a hostile operation dead in its tracks and cause the operatives to focus their hostile efforts elsewhere. These techniques include overt field interviews, overt photography of suspected hostiles, and the highly under-utilized Terry stop, in which a law enforcement officer in the United States can legally stop, interview and frisk a person for weapons if the officer has a reasonable suspicion that criminal activity is afoot, even if the officer's suspicions do not rise to the level of making an arrest.

Also, by denying surveillants perches that are close to the target's point of origin or destination (home or work, for example) a CS team can effectively push hostile surveillance farther and farther away. This injects a great deal ambiguity into the situation and complicates the hostile information-collection effort. For instance, if surveillants do not know what car the target drives, they can easily obtain that information by sitting outside of the person's home and watching what comes out of the garage or driveway. By contrast, surveillants forced to use a perch a mile down the road might have dozens of cars to choose from. CS teams also can conduct more sophisticated SDRs than the lone individual.

In addition, the CS team will keep detailed logs of the people and vehicles it encounters and will database this information along with photos of possible hostiles. This database allows the team to determine whether it has encountered the same person or vehicle repeatedly on different shifts or at different sites. This analytical component of the CS team is essential to the success of the team's efforts, especially when there are multiple shifts working the CS operation or multiple sites are being covered. People also have perishable memories, and databasing ensures that critical information is retained and readily retrievable. CS teams also can conduct more sophisticated SDRs than the lone individual.

Although professional CS teams normally operate in a low-key fashion in order to collect information without changing the behaviors of suspected hostiles, there are exceptions to this rule. When the team believes an attack is imminent or when the risk of allowing a hostile operation to continue undisturbed is unacceptable, for example, team members are likely to break cover and confront hostile surveillants. In cases like these, CS teams have the advantage of surprise. Indeed, materializing out of nowhere to confront the suspected surveillant can be more effective than the arrival of overt security assets.

Well-trained CS teams have an entire arsenal of tricks at their disposal to manipulate and expose hostile surveillance. In this way, they can proactively identify threats early on in the attack cycle — and possibly prevent attacks.

ANTI-666

Just heard that the criminal human trader biogoa zombies want to rename their group into "new world"..right..shows again their facist and satanic involvement..fuck all the fakers and abusers..liars and players..and especially those who have the number 666 on their license plates..i take this as a offering for a voluntary sacrifice..yeah satan is so kool..and the companies and families roth aswell..the shi(e)ld is shown on their flag..just one of many other ugly incestries in this satanazi stateworld..when the cities burn down we will all be warm..they make profit with the dead they sell..the water cant wash the blood off your hands no it cant..ive seen the food train driving by after the shootings in the forest friday evening..guess another covert murder and whatever..this country is more than in trouble..and they dont deserve better..we will say good night and good bye to the old world..

BE AWARE THE DEVIL IS EVERYWHERE!

Anti-Flag: The people or the gun (Full Album): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ldCHJx5-dg

MAYDAYBASH

Impressions from my beautiful natural state-observation.isolation-jail.horror-theater.farm in the nazi canton st. gallen with the fascio on the flag..where they attack us each day and night with frequency torture, spy terror and chemtrail poison..fry our brains which we prefer to eat..close to a place called thurau just like my friend who has been abused by these stadelhofen alphacabalpunks..pretty sure we would find something there..might soon go looking..one-woman.critical-artist.demo-show in the making..guess the costumes are ready for acting..we should all run over our governments like they do in Iraq..hell is a place in Switzooland..fuck all mind reader vampire hypnotists, state slave pedo cripples and all other flag and illitarian asshole kissing wankers..

BURN SWITZOOMINATISTATE!